<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Coming Death of CCD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spotonsecurity.com/2009/07/10/the-coming-death-of-ccd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spotonsecurity.com/2009/07/10/the-coming-death-of-ccd/</link>
	<description>A closer look at the future of video surveillance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:57:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vi Scheeler</title>
		<link>http://spotonsecurity.com/2009/07/10/the-coming-death-of-ccd/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Vi Scheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spotonsecurity.com/?p=151#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Nice introduce!I recently have new choice to buy Digital camera stuff.I have new baby and I want high-speedshutter digit cam to have her photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice introduce!I recently have new choice to buy Digital camera stuff.I have new baby and I want high-speedshutter digit cam to have her photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hwa Hibdon</title>
		<link>http://spotonsecurity.com/2009/07/10/the-coming-death-of-ccd/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Hwa Hibdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spotonsecurity.com/?p=151#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Since i always desired to publish through my web pages things just like yours in some manner you&#039;ve put together a handful of nicely details here. I decides to lookup upon among the content usually seen a lot of visitors should certainly agree about your web log.Fantastic post!Should you need it here webpage the place you could very well purcahse video camera by going online</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since i always desired to publish through my web pages things just like yours in some manner you&#8217;ve put together a handful of nicely details here. I decides to lookup upon among the content usually seen a lot of visitors should certainly agree about your web log.Fantastic post!Should you need it here webpage the place you could very well purcahse video camera by going online</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moises Pasto</title>
		<link>http://spotonsecurity.com/2009/07/10/the-coming-death-of-ccd/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Moises Pasto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spotonsecurity.com/?p=151#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Since i often needed to create throughout my site things comparable yours in some manner you done a lot more quality points in this article. I would have done find on to the particular article and even seen the majority of visitors will agree to your site.Good post!Here web page where shoppers should be able to grab videocamera on the net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since i often needed to create throughout my site things comparable yours in some manner you done a lot more quality points in this article. I would have done find on to the particular article and even seen the majority of visitors will agree to your site.Good post!Here web page where shoppers should be able to grab videocamera on the net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Marman</title>
		<link>http://spotonsecurity.com/2009/07/10/the-coming-death-of-ccd/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Marman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spotonsecurity.com/?p=151#comment-113</guid>
		<description>John,

There are a lot of reasons why some companies are choosing CCD megapixel imagers still, this year. 

For example, most of the megapixel CMOS imagers on the market are not based on the latest pixel designs. Some chips in the most popular products being sold are two generations old.

Secondly, the imagers getting the newest pixel technology are aimed at camcorder or digital camera markets, so they aren&#039;t always usable or even available to security camera manufacturers.

Sony, for example, won&#039;t sell most of their new CMOS imagers to security camera manufacturers, only to consumer electronics companies.

What I&#039;m going on is what the pixel designers are telling me. The latest pixel designs in CMOS are equaling the performance of CCD. Even Sony engineers have now said this, and if anyone has a reason to protect CCD, it would be Sony.

So, I think 2009 will still have companies selecting some CCD imagers, and maybe even into early 2010, but after that I think it is all in the favor of CMOS.

I will add one more important piece to this discussion. CMOS imagers are digital from the chip, so it is easier to process the data, but without the right image processing the low light performance is not as good. Some companies are not including this added noise reduction, which is why their low light performance is over 1 lux.

But this kind of high quality noise reduction will become standard by mid next year, and continue to improve. So, it isn&#039;t just the imagers, it is also the image processing chips that haven&#039;t quite caught up yet.

However, it looks like in 2010 this will all shift to advantage CMOS. That&#039;s why I&#039;m saying the days of CCD are numbered.

I hope that helps.

Doug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>There are a lot of reasons why some companies are choosing CCD megapixel imagers still, this year. </p>
<p>For example, most of the megapixel CMOS imagers on the market are not based on the latest pixel designs. Some chips in the most popular products being sold are two generations old.</p>
<p>Secondly, the imagers getting the newest pixel technology are aimed at camcorder or digital camera markets, so they aren&#8217;t always usable or even available to security camera manufacturers.</p>
<p>Sony, for example, won&#8217;t sell most of their new CMOS imagers to security camera manufacturers, only to consumer electronics companies.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m going on is what the pixel designers are telling me. The latest pixel designs in CMOS are equaling the performance of CCD. Even Sony engineers have now said this, and if anyone has a reason to protect CCD, it would be Sony.</p>
<p>So, I think 2009 will still have companies selecting some CCD imagers, and maybe even into early 2010, but after that I think it is all in the favor of CMOS.</p>
<p>I will add one more important piece to this discussion. CMOS imagers are digital from the chip, so it is easier to process the data, but without the right image processing the low light performance is not as good. Some companies are not including this added noise reduction, which is why their low light performance is over 1 lux.</p>
<p>But this kind of high quality noise reduction will become standard by mid next year, and continue to improve. So, it isn&#8217;t just the imagers, it is also the image processing chips that haven&#8217;t quite caught up yet.</p>
<p>However, it looks like in 2010 this will all shift to advantage CMOS. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m saying the days of CCD are numbered.</p>
<p>I hope that helps.</p>
<p>Doug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Honovich</title>
		<link>http://spotonsecurity.com/2009/07/10/the-coming-death-of-ccd/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>John Honovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spotonsecurity.com/?p=151#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Hi Doug,

I have talked to a number of megapixel camera manufacturers recently who emphasized that they were moving to CCD chips (most frequently cited was Sony CCD chips). There seems to be a lot of concern about low light megapixel image quality and the potential for CCD to resolve this.

What do you think of this?

Best,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Doug,</p>
<p>I have talked to a number of megapixel camera manufacturers recently who emphasized that they were moving to CCD chips (most frequently cited was Sony CCD chips). There seems to be a lot of concern about low light megapixel image quality and the potential for CCD to resolve this.</p>
<p>What do you think of this?</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
